tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5364483493378543681.post7505581352543460356..comments2009-11-13T17:38:52.107ZKate Phizackerleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17788412260256519986noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5364483493378543681.post-15799808374610033662009-11-13T17:38:52.107Z2009-11-13T17:38:52.107ZYour (and everyone else&#39;s) embedded YouTube videos play fine in Google reader btw, and right clicking offers a &quot;Watch on YouTube&quot; option.<br /><br />Thanks for your blog!<br />Martymartyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14868269514043084933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5364483493378543681.post-37641693387106726972009-11-13T05:42:21.156Z2009-11-13T05:42:21.156ZThe problem I have with the Hawass statements is that a major flood occurred shortly after KV-62 was sealed, robbed and resealed. The flood debris produced a dense floor to the valley and caused the hiding of KV-62 (perhaps KV-64 also). Best guesses are that the flood happened prior to the death of Horemheb. To me it seems more likely that KV-63 was cut after the flood and continued to be used in the 19th dynasty. This would date the tomb to well after any Amarna mummies were moving about. Could it have been used for for Ankhesenamun??? Some think that the flood was the reason for Ay&#39;s use of the West Valley tomb.Dennishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06020260892622753614noreply@blogger.com